Journalists Caught on Hot Mic Engaging in Disturbing Banter about Trump: “Consider a Convertible. The Weather’s Lovely!”

In a shocking incident, leftist journalists covering former President Trump’s criminal immunity appeal were caught on a hot mic engaging in dark humor and fantasizing about his potential assassination. The incident took place on Tuesday, as the DC Circuit Court of Appeals prepared to hear oral arguments in Trump’s appeal regarding presidential immunity. The journalists’ disturbing remarks have sparked outrage and raised questions about journalistic ethics and the potential consequences of such comments.

The appeal centered around the issue of presidential immunity, with Trump’s legal team seeking to dismiss the case based on First Amendment and presidential immunity claims. Judge Tanya Chutkan had previously denied two motions by Trump’s legal team to dismiss the case. The appeal was set to be heard by a three-judge panel consisting of Judge J. Michelle Childs, Judge Florence Pan, and Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson.

As a group of reporters gathered outside the courthouse, eagerly awaiting Trump’s arrival, a hot mic captured two journalists engaging in disturbing banter about the possibility of Trump’s assassination. The journalists, unidentified but operating under the Associated Press live feed, complained about their vantage point and jokingly discussed the idea of Trump being shot, drawing parallels to the tragic assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

The exchange included comments like, “You know what the worst part is? Even if he has his window open and he’s hanging out of it, he will be on the other side of the street,” and, “I mean, if he’s driving, we’ve got a good shot!” The journalists even mused about Trump being in a convertible, with one jokingly suggesting, “You should take a convertible! It’s so nice out!” The macabre conversation ended with laughter from one of the journalists.

The revelation of the journalists’ remarks has sparked widespread condemnation, with users on various platforms expressing their outrage over the dark and biased humor. Many have raised concerns about the lack of professionalism and ethics in journalism, questioning the appropriateness of such comments, especially considering the seriousness of the legal proceedings involving a former president.

As of now, the identities of the journalists involved remain unknown, leaving questions about the potential repercussions for their disturbing remarks. The live feed was operated by the Associated Press, raising speculation about whether the Secret Service or other authorities will take action in response to the journalists’ inappropriate and potentially threatening comments.

The incident involving the journalists’ disturbing remarks brings to light the challenges and responsibilities that come with reporting on high-profile legal proceedings. The need for unbiased and ethical journalism becomes even more crucial in such situations. As the fallout from this incident continues, it remains to be seen if any actions will be taken against the journalists involved and how it might impact public trust in media organizations.

H/T BizPac Review

Share the Post:

Recent Stories